Questions Over Prescriptions
Twenty years sitting with people at their crossroads taught me one thing: a single honest question does what the best advice cannot.
Field note · 29 November 2025 · 4 min read
The man drove four hours to ask me what he should do with his business. He arrived at my door in Delphi with coffee, a notebook, a pen uncapped. He was ready to receive wisdom — I could see it in the posture. Leaning forward. Prepared.
I asked him what he'd do if I weren't here.
He laughed, then stopped. "I'd probably just keep going," he said. "Or quit. I genuinely don't know."
"Which one feels more true today?"
And we were suddenly somewhere real.

Advice is a map of where you've already been
I've given advice. Earlier in my work I delivered what was asked for: frameworks, options, clearly articulated paths. Some of it landed. But I noticed, over time, that advice lands in proportion not to how good it is, but to how much the person already knows the answer. When someone left a session nodding and relieved, it was rarely because I'd told them something new. More often, I'd asked a question that let them hear themselves think — and then, because I was also talking, they attributed the clarity to me.
A map is a useful thing. But a map — even a very good one — is a description of terrain someone else has already walked. When you hand a person a map of your landscape and say "you are here," you're making two assumptions: that their landscape resembles yours, and that they want to go where you went.
Neither is reliable.
A question does something different. It asks the person to locate themselves — to notice what is actually true for them, not what they think they should say. It's the difference between handing someone a map and asking them to describe what they can see from where they're standing. The second method is slower. It's also the only one that tells you where they actually are.
The oracle at Delphi rarely gave you a straight answer. Her cryptic response sent you back to figure out what you already thought — which amounts to the same thing. I've been thinking about that for twenty years, walking past γνῶθι σεαυτόν — "know thyself" — carved in stone near my door. The Sages wrote it there, not the Oracle — but she answered questions beneath those words for centuries. It wasn't a gesture for her visitors, either.
Why we reach for the prescription
There's a cost to sitting with someone in not-knowing. It can feel like failing to help.
I understand the pull. The person across from you is at a crossroads and they've asked for direction. Silence feels cruel. So you fill it with a framework — not because the framework is wrong, but because it's easier than asking the question that might disturb both of you.
Advice is also, if you're honest, a little self-serving. When I dispense wisdom I'm performing competence. When I ask a question, I disappear from the equation. The credit goes where it belongs: to the person who already knew.
This is what makes the prescription so seductive. For both parties.
The questions I keep coming back to
The questions I actually use are not clever. They are almost embarrassingly plain.
What do you actually want here?
What are you afraid would happen if this worked?
What do you already know that you're not quite saying?
That third one produces a long pause. People know more than they're willing to articulate, especially at their own crossroads. There is a cost to saying the true thing — it commits you to knowing it. The pause before the answer is usually the person deciding whether they're ready to pay that.
Socrates understood this. The Meno demonstrates it exactly: through questions alone — no diagrams, no instruction — he draws correct geometric reasoning from an uneducated slave boy. The philosophical argument Plato was making is about the nature of knowledge. The practical residue is simpler: structured questioning got there when instruction alone would not have. The question was the instrument.
What's already there
In Yoruba thought, ori names more than the inner self — it is a personal deity, a destiny chosen before birth. My mother grew up in Lagos. She used that word the way other people use the word "gut": the "inner head," the part of you that already knows what you were made for, before expectation and comparison settled over it.
When I work with someone, I'm not trying to help them decide something. I'm trying to help them excavate what they already know. Their values aren't hiding in some goal they haven't reached yet — they're in the evidence of their actual choices. Where do you spend the time nobody told you to spend? What have you consistently chosen under pressure, when the easier option was available?
That's not a question about where you should go. It's a question about where you already are.

This is the archaeology. And most people, given a quiet question and enough space to answer honestly, can do it themselves.
They just need someone to stop talking long enough for them to try.
---
The man with the notebook put his pen down early in our second hour. We talked for nearly two hours. He drove four hours back with nothing written.
He messaged three weeks later to say he'd decided to sell.
He thanked me for the advice.